Is Laura Knight Jadczyk a Psychopath?
Or how LKJ told a woman to lie to the French Police in order to falsely incarcerate an innocent man.
Jay Weidner here:
Apparently the French authorities are investigating
Laura Knight Jadczyk. Below is her recent description of what is happening
to the cult and how the French authorities are handling Ms. Jadczyk. I will
be coming in from time to time to comment on her remarks. But I must tell
you from the beginning that Laura Knight Jadczyk’s remarks below are proof positive that she is a full-blown psychopath. My comments will be in bold. Laura is writing this just in case you don’t
“UPDATE: This ridiculous situation of being investigated by the French Police Judiciare searching for some "infractions" continues so we decided to bump the story back to the top with the updates. It is beyond all imagining that such a big to-do is being made about such a pathetically cooked-up allegation. But I guess that if you live your life cleanly and make sure you cross all your "t's" and dot your "i's," legally
speaking, the people that want you to shut up and go away get desperate
and try to find any accusation, no matter how weak and unfounded, to harass
wear you out.
Here we discover that Laura lives a clean life and she does everything perfect when it comes to legal matters.
member of the SOTT household was interrogated by the French police
on Sept 14, and still another, Dr. Gabriela Segura, will be interrogated
15th (today). We have been advised that I, LKJ, will be interrogated
believe it or not, they are finally going to get around to interrogating
the woman who is at the center of the situation next week.
the questions that have been asked and the way they were asked (along with
the fact that the Police Judiciare got a court
order to access
our bank records and probably have been tapping our phones and
internet service), we have been able to get a vague idea of what they are
trying to find out.
Among those questions is one about sex. That is, do we demand celibacy
from our "followers" and in our house?! Apparently, someone told
them that we do which is totally ridiculous but you see where a
You end up having to explain your SEX LIFE to the police! Can anybody
really believe this is happening?
Seems perfectly fine if
they want to ask about someone’s sex life, especially if it is
in a group living situation that reeks of a cult. How many cults
we discovered that use sex or lack of sex to
control its members? It would be the first area of inquiry if one
were trying to find out if they were dealing with a cult.
really is incredible that the French government is so naive
that they buy
the lies of
an internet psychopath and are continuing to waste tax money,
time and energy
on this ridiculous "investigation". And that is why we don't,
for a minute, believe that there is nothing sinister behind
is telling us that a dangerous psychopath is after her and
is steering the police towards the investigation. Apparently
has no motive for what he is doing. All we really learn about
him is that Laura calls him a psychopath. So he is the 50
millionth person she has called a psychopath. With her high school education
experience in the fields of psychology or psychiatry I think
can presume that the person in question has not been properly
defined as a psychopath. Laura is just name calling here. Something
she really likes to do.
keep in mind, people, that the whole thing started because
of an online conversation among about a dozen women. One
relationship of abuse and was asking her online women friends
(many of whom she had
met in real life, so these weren't just perfect strangers)
for help in figuring out how to get the abuser to leave.
new here, women frequently get together and bitch about their
men. The only thing here to understand is that Laura is telling
of the women have never met the woman in question and really
know her motivations in all of this.
went on for a couple of years. We discussed the book Women
Who Run With the Wolves by
Jungian psychologist, Clarissa Pinkola-Estes and the fact that
she was in a Bluebeard
She told the guy over and over again that she wanted to end
the relationship, that she wanted him to go.
this kind of thing happens in almost every relationship and
I am sure,
in fact I know that Laura
has been in a few relationships where things
were falling apart and one side was trying to hold it together.
The real question is: if the relationship was that bad why
she just leave? Answer: Because she was just a woman bitching
about her boyfriend
other women. She wasn’t
going to leave. Because if she was going to leave, she would
revealed many incidents of abuse and suggested sexual abuse
of her children.
A … er …suggesting
sexual abuse is a far different thing than accusing someone
of sexual abuse. If he abused her she should have gone to
If he abused
her children she should have had him arrested. But there
is one other important factor here. Why didn’t
Laura, once she saw that the woman in question was not reporting
any of this to the police, report it herself? In fact it
is illegal to
knowingly cover up
He resisted and countered every
effort like the perfect parasite he is, even telling her
at one point
that if she
him, she could just leave and he would keep the house and
sure what she means by resisted but telling someone to leave
because they don’t like you anymore is a perfectly reasonable
response. It would seem from Laura’s
telling that he is actually trying to salvage the relationship
and the woman, encouraged by Laura and her attack gang, wanted
to end it.
why not walk out?
The real question, which remains unanswered, is: did she
ever walk out on the guy?
Finally, I (LKJ) just
told her to threaten him with reporting him to the police
to leave. My
Then make it simple for him: Be a Wolf woman and make him so
he does not want to be there. Or put his clothes out and
change the locks and tell him if
he comes near you, you will cut yourself, call the police
and tell them he did it. Tell him you will
report him for abusing the children. Tell him that
you will deny on the Bible that you ever said anything like
that and it won't matter anyway because he will be in jail
You gotta play hardball here.
my friends we present the evidence that Laura Knight Jadczyk
is a full
In the above
quote she is tells the woman in question to cut herself and
tell the police that her boyfriend did it. She then tells her
take an oath
that he cut her. She then tells her that this phone call to
the police - where she lies to them - will be just fine because
will be in
jail because of what she just did.
Laura Knight Jadcyzk encouraged one of her cult followers
to make up a lie, repeat the lie to the police, all in an effort
to put an innocent
in prison for a long time. Some of you might find this
shocking but a close examination of Laura’s past reveals that she has
been at this for quite awhile, But back to Laura’s
ramblings because it just gets better.
I never advised her to actually make any such accusations to
it was all about finding the right words to get him to leave,
and if that included
threatening him with exposure, do it!
Now this sentence
seals the deal and we can now see the entire scene coming
into focus. After
telling the woman to call the police and lie to them.
After telling the woman to cut herself and blame the guy,
after telling the woman that this single phone call will
in prison, Laura
does an about face
and tells the reader that she never told the woman to lie
to the police. So let’s
look at her words again to make sure that I am not making
a false accusation.
exact words were:
Then make it simple for him: Be
a Wolf woman and make him so miserable that he does not want
to be there.
his clothes out and change the locks and tell him if
he comes near you, you will cut yourself, call the police
them he did
him you will report him for abusing the children. Tell
you will deny on the Bible that you ever said anything like
that and it won't matter anyway because he will be in jail
You gotta play hardball here.”
Pretty sure I’m reading this right. She, that is
Laura, is telling the woman to cut herself. Call the police
them he did
Seems pretty clear that she was telling the woman
to make up false testimony against an innocent man. He is
No matter what the woman in question says.
he was obviously worried that this would really happen, so
HE went to the police to preempt the possibility that she
him of abuse
ex is going to accuse me of abuse, but I'm innocent!),
he is innocent until PROVEN guilty
the email badly translated so it read as though I was actually
telling her to go to the police, not just threaten him to
get him out, and
raft of ridiculous lies created by a total psychopath, that
we run a cult, that I hypnotize people to turn them into
mind-controlled slave/zombies, etc.
No Laura all
he had to do is produce the email where you told his girlfriend
to lie to the police.
And why is he a psychopath?
I am not a psychologist but I would say that the person who
is advising someone
over the internet to lie to the police is not only a full
blown psychopath but actually kind of stupid.
any district attorney or police force with two firing neurons
in contact with one another would have contacted me, asked
to see an original to determine what was really said, asked
about the context, and the whole thing would have been sorted
told some one to lie to the authorities. Any reasonable person
would assume that you would encourage others to lie again
and that you
would also lie.
That would be the take that a person with more than two neurons
firing would make.
that isn't what has happened. Thus far, for going on 7
months now, the French Police Judiciare has been spending
of time searching
for "infractions" and
combing through our bank records (they now know how poor
we are), calling anybody whose name appears on a check we
to ask details
about our business, interviewing people (4 and 5 hour interviews),
and basically acting like it is a case of national importance.
Can you grok
this is so pathetic and stupid one can hardly wrap their
head around it! Geeze! All
I did was tell a female friend to say whatever she had
to say to get the parasite in her life off his rear end and
please Laura’s words
again. She told her female friend to cut herself and tell
the police that he did it. That she should tell the police
their children. Just
think what Laura is doing to those poor children?
get this, the police captain in charge has been told these
twist it around to: "Well, if she thought he was abusing
her children, she should have made a police report!" That
is: blaming the victim.
Excuse me Laura. That
is the 64 million dollar question. The REAL question Laura,
you ask her this question? You are really coming off as
and dumb here. I expected more from you.
in mind that she was just suspecting things, not certain
trying to get him
to leave, go away, hit the road, Jack, and don't come back.
So now Laura admits that there is no proof of any of her
accusations, we already know that she never reported anything
to the police.
Without any evidence why would she call him a psychopath?
Why would she accuse
him of anything without evidence?
Because that is how Laura deals with everything as
you will soon find out!
It was a tense and unpleasant
situation that needed to be dealt with before she could
begin to look for
evidence of abuse.
considering the federal case that is being made about an
email I wrote, what would they have done to her if she
had no proof
do you prove
that stuff anyway?
Now we are descending into
literary hell. A familiar place for Laura’s
Further, the victim HAS made complaints
to the police about "Jean" but was told that it wasn't
worthy of a real investigation or charge!
So, this man, "Jean", can physically attack a woman, steal his
ex-partner's hard drive AND use a private email badly translated
as the basis
of false accusations that get the Police involved in a 7 month
investigation, but nothing he has
done is worthy of investigating? Say what?
note that Laura’s
writing ability is beginning to deteriorate. If he physically
attacked the woman why then didn’t she report it? Furthermore,
Laura, why didn’t
you pick up the phone and call the police the minute that you
heard the woman’s
Either that, or the French authorities
have been tasked with putting SOTT out of business.
If that is
they are really
and, since we live clean lives and obey the laws of
the land, manage our activities with care, there isn't
us of... so
they have had to
create it almost literally out of nothing.
of nothing? Really? Advising a person to cut herself and
that someone else
did it so that he goes to prison is nothing? Advising a
person to tell the police that this person molested her
is really crazy about it is that the whole money-wasting,
time-wasting, energy wasting, farce is because I
advised a woman involved
with an abuser, a pedophile,
who had physically, sexually, psychologically abused
other women and children in the past, to threaten
him with exposure
We do, indeed,
live in bizarro world.
Yes indeed we do Laura.
A long glance in the mirror will prove that one
for sure. Personally
I hope that
this dude ‘Jean’ sues your ass over the last set of statements.
What we are really seeing here folks is that Laura Knight
Jadczyk has very
social graces. She really does not know what is appropriate
behavior. If she was positive that the woman was being
abused, both physically
and sexually, by a psychopath, then Laura had no other
duty then to inform the local authorities about the person
question, Jean. But
not do this. Why? Because Laura probably wasn’t
100% sure that the woman was telling the truth.
It is either that or Laura is an idiot. Okay okay
that is a valid argument.
other than an idiot
would advise someone to lie to the police and do
it on the internet?
The real point though is this: Laura Knight Jadczyk
has gone out of her way to attack people saying the most
outlandish things. Many
wondered why she does this. Many have asked why she goes
out of her way to make so many needless enemies, like Jean.
the situation up in the fancy clothes of her championing
some cause or that
she is a victim, both of these classical psychopathic traits
by the way. My conclusion is that Laura is a seriously disturbed
read the paragraph quoted above and see nothing wrong in
it. She can actually read the words, her words, saying that
lie and then say that we should notice that I never told
tell the police. This is seriously warped shit here folks.
is a popular news and news analysis web site, but
how many of our readers know what goes on behind the scenes
don't, we think
you were brought up to speed, for a very specific
First, a little history.
Sott.net (aka Signs of the Times) began as a small internet project of Laura
Knight-Jadczyk back in 2002. Particularly since
the 9/11 attacks, Laura had been keeping a close eye on current
events and noticing
and lies that were being passed off as 'news'.
also begun to notice that many very interesting
stories were receiving
by the major
media outlets, not to mention the items that
were being scrubbed from the net. Her natural response (natural
for her, but
perhaps not everyone),
was to create
a web site to remedy this. In the 9 years since
of the Times has
grown into the Sott.net you know and appreciate
today and holds true to the initial remit of
- to bring
and insane world.
Actually sott was and is a cut
and paste operation using stories gleaned from
various websites around the
she just ripped off Jeff Rense’s
great site. She occasionally throws in a
badly written story by Joe Quinn to make it
look good. Also and firstly
a magnet site to
money into her cassiopean cult.
penchant for digging into stories to find
the truth of the matter
begin in 2002
however. For many years previous (all of
her adult life in fact), Laura had been
by a need to figure out the nature of the
world in which she lived. Her long years
ancient history, to psychology to the paranormal
and back again. It should be said that her
research never strayed
academic views on these topics. In the early
1990's however, a number of (at the time)
inexplicable experiences (detailed
prompted Laura to delve into research on
- horror of horrors - the hysterical world
alleged alien abductions.
wont to say, of
all the people who never wanted to know anything
UFOs, she deserves a
the head of the line. But there it was, things
had happened that were inexplicable and Laura
wasn't going to shove
Laura introduces us to her other half of
her broken personality. She starts writing about herself in the third person.
using the first person would seem a bit
awkward. Laura sent her books out to
all of the major publishers in the USA
and she was summarily rejected by all of them. The comments from publishers
in unison. They said
that Laura can’t tell a story. Her text
goes nowhere just vectoring and vectoring
like a wounded butterfly. I tried
reading her stuff
and find her entire body
of work to just be one long rip off project.
There is not a shred of originality to
be found anywhere.
cut a long story short, recognizing the
paranormal essence of
the UFO phenomenon
this as part of
her research into
the branch of the paranormal known as 'psychical
research' (wildly popular in late 19th
and early 20th century
England and America
- seances, table-tipping,
contacting dead relatives etc), she decided
to try her own little experiment using
what is traditionally
board, but which
is really just a square piece of cardboard
letters of the alphabet on it. Again,
the reasons for this experiment and the
research that went into selecting the tool
detailed in Amazing
is purposefully rearranging her own chronology
here. I don’t
know why. Perhaps her memory is slipping.
But SOTT was created long
after the ouija board experiments and
the cassiopaeans etc. I think what
she is doing is she
is trying to show something that is sort
of legitimate like sott and placing it first and then back tracking into
aspects of her limited
Enter the 'Cassiopaeans'
After about two years of weekly 'sessions' where she and a friend or two or
three would sit down on a Saturday evening and ask the stereotypical questions
like "is anybody there" and receive back mostly garbled nonsense, a shockingly
coherent series of 'messages' began to be relayed, spelled out, letter by letter
via the board. Thus began what has become known as the 'Cassiopaean transmissions',
or to be more precise, a rather interesting experiment in 'superluminal communication'
(based on the suggestion from the 'Cassiopaeans' that they are "us in the future").
With the crucial input of her mathematical physicist husband Arkadiusz Jadczyk
(whom she married in 1998 as a result of matchmaking by the Cassiopaeans),
Laura used the often cryptic messages received from the 'Cassiopaeans' as clues
to new directions for her ongoing research. As Laura has often said publicly
herself, the Cassiopaean information has always been the 10% inspiration to
the 90% 'perspiration' that she and her fellow researchers have put into their
work over the past 15 years. Nothing has been, or ever will be, taken on blind
faith. After all, any purported Truth, by definition, must be able to stand
Basically she channels aliens through an ouija board. ‘Nuff said
During this time, in addition to her other work, Laura began to post the information
obtained via the board sessions on her newly created web site Cassiopaea.org (which
also hosted the original Signs of the Times page).
These 'transcripts' were received with much public interest (not to mention
commentary!) and within a year Laura decided to start a Yahoo discussion
group as a venue for those interested in her work to discuss the details
Prior to this her inbox had been flooded daily with questions and comments,
so this was a necessary move.
In early 2003 Wow a seven year time leap suddenly has occurred!!!
and Ark moved to France with their family. The main reasons for this trans-Atlantic
relocation were Laura's increasing revulsion at the path on which the Bush
government had set the formerly democratic USA, and Ark's desire to pursue
his work and
collaborate with other scientists free from the strictures he had experienced
within the American scientific establishment.
Actually it was to escape with the cash generated from the false house
raffle and the subsequent sale of the house. The ‘scientific establishment’ that
Ark was getting away from was the pentagon and more specifically
the agency in the pentagon known as DARPA. Interestingly enough Jim
Jones went to a DARPA controlled
hospital and when he came out he became the psychopathic leader of
a doomsday cult, taking his followers away from the USA for the same
and exact reasons that
Laura is stating. YIKES!!!
Rather than pursue the (potentially)
long process of putting their house up for sale (George Bush was
banging the war
drums), Laura had the somewhat eccentric idea of holding a raffle.
Tickets were issued to 1) anyone who made a $50 donation; 2) anyone
in a written request via snail-mail, a condition required by law.
Approximately 300 tickets
were issued in return for donations made and approximately 2000 tickets
issued to those who requested one by mail and made no donation whatsoever.
This was not surprising given the limited marketing potential of
announcing a house raffle on a relatively unknown web site.
Fraud can be called ‘eccentric’. Personally I like how George Bush
is somehow responsible for all of this.
Now, this sum
of approximately $15,000 was not exactly a good deal for a house
was valued at over
$100,000, but Ark and Laura made arrangements for a loan to be
taken out to cover the
difference, picked a winner, and left the matter in the hands
of a trusted neighbor and an attorney he had recommended. Their
supplemented by a generous gift from a friend. As it turned out
(after Laura and Ark had
moved to France), the winner of the house raffle was apparently
stymied by the neighbor and attorney who seemingly wanted the
house to go
so they could pick it up at auction. Laura was notified about
this situation by both her U.S. bank and another neighbor who
in to purchase
the house - with Laura's agreement - and stop the foreclosure.
It’s funny but when I put Laura’s article into MS Word to write my comments the editor in MS Word finds the above paragraph unreadable. None of Laura’s other paragraphs are deemed unreadable by the software but this one is riddled with grammatical errors. The reason is that Laura is completely lying and she can’t say it clearly. Therefore her entire writing style collapses and she resorts to fragmented sentences and unclear passages. The truth is that she is lying here. There was no winner named, if so who was it? How can a neighbor stop someone from selling HER house? All of the sudden Laura’s clarity descends into hell. She is not even sure why the winner could not get the house because she says that the winner was ‘apparently stymied’. The neighbor and the attorney (who?) ‘seemingly’ wanted
the house. Seemingly? They either wanted it or not. Did they
pay someone for it? Who? What happened to the winner?
The main outstanding
feature of this debacle was that the only real winners were
That’s nice to hear because we can’t understand a single thing she
is saying here. It is like listening to the head of the CIA at a press conference.
It is pure 100% bullshit. She knows it and we know it.
take-home fact from this incident is this: if Laura and Ark
had decided to INTENTIONALLY
run a 'Raffle Scam' it would not have turned into such a
lawyer feeding frenzy because the ending would have been
part of the
scams are one of the simplest cons to pull off ... any moron
can do it. The scammers
have a faithful follower (or even a sock puppet on the Net)
gleefully posting "I won, I won" all
over the web. The grand prize (car, house, etc) changes title
to an anonymous corporation in Delaware ... and that's that.
this happened, which
spells out clearly that there was no intent to defraud anyone.
There was no raffle 'scam' and there were no 'victims' ...
just a fouled
up fundraiser that didn't
turn out the way anyone planned, especially Laura.
Laura is on such
thin ice here that it hurts. Why doesn’t she name the person
who won, tell us why this person decided to not take the
house, provide an email contact so that
this winner can give their side? Because there was no winner.
We have already seen how easily lying comes to the lips of
Laura Knight Jadczyk. Why not tell
some more lies.?
The people who actually made donations
for raffle tickets to the "seemed like a good idea at the time" fundraiser
know and accept honest mistakes as a fact of life, and they
don't hold Laura and Ark to some unreasonable
standard of perfection. Members bought their tickets to support
their group, it was their money, and not a single one of
them has brought
a verifiable public
complaint against Laura and Ark. Not one! The raffle was
held honestly and fairly. The names of all those who responded
a 'hat' and one name was randomly
selected, and that person was notified that they had won
and given information about how to contact the lawyer handling
of ownership. What happened
after that was completely out of Laura and Ark's hands because
they had moved to France.
Here Laura in the third person is skirting with disaster. She still has not named the winner or told us why the winner has refused the house. But somehow she knows how each and every person who purchased a ticket thinks and feels inside.
anyone who actually took part in the raffle had a beef
with Laura, Ark, the group, school, etc, they could easily have
refund on their ticket, posted it on the many slander sites
and forum threads....and SIGNED THEIR NAME TO IT. A legitimate
raffle ticket holder
could have filed an action in small claims court and posted
that paperwork too.
Laura, you were living in France. They would have to file in Toulouse and you know that.
of this has happened, check for yourself ... there are
NO pending lawsuits and/or outstanding criminal charges
Arkadiusz Jadczyk! These are LIES being spread all over
the Internet by Vincent Bridges,
Jay Weidner, Chris Horlacher and their tiny troop of
deranged minions. They've taken an honest mistake that Laura made
and apologized for
years ago, and
twisted it to the point that it's totally unrecognizable
when compared to the actual
truth of the matter. But enough on that topic.
Yes that would be a good idea Laura. I bet that the editor software
in MS Word won’t have as much trouble with your meandering sentences and fragmented ideas as witnessed above. This article goes on and on after this with Laura bragging about what a great ‘investigative journalist’ she
The point of this posting is to refute Laura Knight Jadczyk’s erroneous and ridiculous statements. In the article that follows, which I am not going to bore you with, she releases private exchanges between the man she accuses of being a psychopath and his wife. After going on and on about how unfair it is that Jean took info from his wife’s lap top she then takes info from his wife’s
laptop and puts the transcripts out for the world
to see. Page after page of transcripts were released to make this guy look
bad. This is a familiar tactic
used by Laura. Of course the fact that she heavily
edits all of these transcripts to make the person look really bad is never
told to the reader. Laura did this
with me (Jay Weidner). In 2002 I stupidly tried to
make a peace agreement between her and my former go-writer Vincent Bridges.
She took my peace offering as a
stab in the back and released our private email exchange
without permission. Comparing her release of our email exchange and the real
email exchange reveals
that Laura is editing through the emails removing
comments by her that make her look stupid and adding comments that make her
look smart. She also edits my words
so I sound dumb. There is little doubt that she edits
all the transcripts that she releases. Laura has no regard for the truth.
She is a hysterical, ridiculous
pseudo intellectual without a shred of original thought
In the future I will be deconstructing more of her essays so that
the interested reader can reach conclusions based on evidence instead of
For the entire article by Laura write me at firstname.lastname@example.org